... just saw Adam Guettel and Tina Landau’s Floyd
Collins musical at the University of Miami’s Ring Theater with Larry, Gary,
and Roger, and I wanted to jot down my impressions of it…
Resurrecting
a critically-acclaimed Off-Broadway production that ran for only 25
performances in New York in 1996 (it had been eclipsed to some extent by the tragic circumstances
of Jonathan Larsen’s RENT), the ambitious collaboration by my colleagues and
students at UM’s Theatre Arts department thoroughly impressed me. Crisply
directed by JV Mercanti, with masterful musical direction of the hybrid
bluegrass/Bartok-esque score by NDavid Williams, and stunningly energetic and
percussive choreography by Christine Kellogg, the unconventional experimental musical
was without doubt one of the more challenging pieces I’ve witnessed in a
college setting. The ensemble cast of student actors and orchestra fully embraced performing the difficult score with precision and abandon. With costume design by
K. April Soroko, lighting by Bryan Kaschube, and a striking set by student designer
Lauren Coghlan, the creative team vividly transported the audience into the
world of rural 1920s Kentucky. Although the opening night of the production was
hindered by a few technical problems that are inevitable in an endeavor of this
scope and likely to be fixed in subsequent performances, the talented ensemble
cast and orchestra succeeded in not only telling a moving and entertaining
story, but more importantly, in challenging the audience to ponder our current
situation vis-à-vis Nature, Technology, and the American system.
On
the surface a true story about an entrapped Kentucky cave explorer who dies of
hunger and exposure after 16 days underground, for me, Floyd Collins resonated as an extended metaphor about human life on
the planet earth in the postmodern era. As in the present, in which we are
grappling with the effects of climate change after two centuries of industrial
exploitation of the earth’s resources, in the play (based on actual events from
1925), a man’s desire to harness nature for his own material gain backfires. In
the wake of Floyd’s broken dreams, a callous and selfish society watches as the
earth swallows him whole.
The
first solo musical numbers in the play feature Floyd singing and dancing in the cave,
daydreaming about what he might be able to accomplish economically with his
discovery of this precious natural resource within the earth. In these scenes,
the hollow cave becomes a vessel for Floyd’s fantasies. After shimmying through
a narrow tunnel, he finds a surprisingly huge expanse of underground space, and
imagines how it could be harnessed as a tourist attraction that might yield his
rural family great economic prosperity, with, I paraphrase, “…signs on the highway
alerting folks to the attraction, a 24-hour concessions stand, and a curio shop.”
Floyd’s opening musical numbers emphasize his youthful joy and optimism, as he
sings and yodels with delight while exploring the cave further. (His nostalgia
for past explorations and connection to the earth is a recurring theme
throughout, as he also sings about earlier good times with his brother and
sister in later scenes, even as he lies pinned under the rocks.) Like an archetypal
prehistoric man, Floyd plans to use the earth’s resources in order to provide
for a better life for himself and his family.
The
morning after he’s gone missing, trapped in the narrow crawlspace, Floyd’s
brother Homer finds him and
alerts the townsfolk to his whereabouts. Despite their efforts, they are unable
to rescue him, as a wedged rock that has fallen on his leg blocks access.
Floyd’s
impending doom is artfully woven into the narrative, yet his pervasive sense of
hope often overpowers it and creates suspense. In this way, although I knew his fate before the
curtain rose, as a spectator, I found myself hoping that somehow things would
turn out differently. While Floyd lies below, an assembly of clueless men above
prove themselves ineffectual as their own selfish motivations to become heroes
or profit at the expense of this potentially tragic situation obscures their
brainstorming. The gruesome passage where they try to remove Floyd from the
cavern with a harness and rope tied around his waist evokes a feeling of
medieval punishment or torture. (Echoing this feeling, water drops also
incessantly fall on his head in the bleak February cold. Yet still, for much of
the narrative, Floyd remains optimistic.) The harness scene also showcases the
engineer’s and patriarch’s lack of foresight, as no medical preparations are
taken even as they are contemplating a potentially dangerous maneuver that
might sacrifice Floyd’s leg in the process.
Interestingly,
in the conversations he has underground with his would-be rescuers, Floyd reveals
his belief that the caves in Kentucky are all united by, as he says, some kind
of “system.” This word is emphasized in the dialogue, perhaps because the play’s
narrative also reveals to the audience a variety of other human systems that surround
and are fueled by the tragic event. For example, the story, initially reported
on by local newsman Skeets Miller, becomes syndicated from coast to coast via
telegraph and the then new technology of amateur radio. In one scene, Skeets
explains to Floyd what the term ‘syndication’ means. National syndication of
news items had been in practice since the Civil War era, but for Floyd – a rural
entrepreneur/modern caveman – the concept is mind-boggling. When the hometown story
explodes into a national phenomenon, Sand Cave becomes a ‘social media site’ of
sorts (albeit before there was such a thing) as people from all corners of the
country travel to witness the situation. A carnivalesque atmosphere arises that
echoes the sense of commercial and corporate mayhem that our current 24-hour
news cycle provides with its endless advertising hiding behind a thin veil of repetitive
news programming (that is often composed of a higher percentage of speculation
and opinion/commentary – “spin” – as opposed to actual “news.”) The entrepreneurs
and capitalists exploit the terribly heartbreaking situation. They see the rubber-necking
crowd developing around Floyd as an opportunity to sell their wares. Highlighting
the vulture-like quality of the news industry and the public whose insatiable
hunger it serves, the play provokes numerous questions about our American “system.”
From
a dramatic standpoint, Floyd’s fate (of untimely death) likens his family to characters
from ancient Greek tragedy. Like them, both Floyd and his father attempt to bargain with the
divine, beseeching their god for help that never arrives. Also reminiscent of
Greek tragedy, the play emphasizes Floyd’s relationships with his kin,
especially his brother and sister, and their collective nostalgia for the
carefree days of youth. A particularly beautiful and somewhat homoerotic fantasy
scene features the two brothers curled in a tender embrace. The love shared between
Floyd and his sister Nellie, whose solos are among the most poignant and
affective in the show, stands apart from the dog-eat-dog world above, where men
jockey for the most advantageous position.
In
his first few days underground, Floyd refuses his destiny. Yet while his father
turns an opportunistic buck at his expense, and the engineer proves ignorant
about nature’s response to his use of technology, faced with his own death, Floyd
comes to accept reality. Floyd’s final song and dance is particularly moving:
vivid, truthful, full of wistful pain and the trauma of still-hopeful dreams struggling
to shine through the darkness of a broken heart. This naive optimism lingers as
a potential balm to quell the helpless realization that technology will never
render man stronger than the earth itself. No matter how gorgeous the melodies sung
by individual voices, social man’s highest artistic achievements and systems are
little more than vaudeville song and dance routines when compared with nature’s
magnificently unpredictable atonality.
Other
thoughts:
Movie camera
– motif of aspiring filmmaker trying to divert Homer, Floyd’s brother, from
his rescue efforts by tempting him to fantasize about a film career. She chases him around the set with a camera, and he has to fight against allowing the temptation of fame distract him from the more important and pressing matter at hand.
Use
of the clanging sound of the hammer chiseling the rock – evokes sounds from
capitalistic industrial society. Reminiscent of STOMP, a performance-art dance/drumming experimental theater piece from the 1990s.
Choreography
– creates sense of crowd mayhem with a relatively small cast through bright splashes
of energetic movement.
Costumes
– characters are dressed in various beige tones in Act II as hope washes out
and they become more uniformly conforming to the “system” that sucks life from
them.
Lighting
– beautiful use of lavender in the cave crawl space around Floyd evokes simultaneous
sensations of hope, melancholy, and love. Set off by yellow lights.
Set
– artful transformation of space that offered visual levels, potential for
movement, and a sense of the higher status of the power of nature over man/technology.
2 comments:
This comment is for your The Birth of Gay Theatre. Unless you are limiting gay to male homosexuals, you are missing information about e.g. Basil Rathbone's The Captive, and Lillian Hellman's Children's Hour. Though Rathbone's play was shut down and the lead actresses arrested when the play was produced at Empire Theatre in 1926, he was an early advocate against prohibitions against homosexuality being visible. Hellman's play ran for 691 performances at the Maxine Elliott Theatre from its opening night on November 20, 1934. The Empire Theatre and the Maxine Elliott Theatre were in the early Broadway district before it moved above 41st in NYC. The latter seated 935 patrons so to say that Hellman's play was popular is an understatement. Not a happy piece granted but definitely an important one for lesbian cinema.
Dear Anna Fahraeus, Thank you for your comment. In the first sentence of the essay, I defined "gay theater" as being "by, for, and about uncloseted gay people," and I don't think Lillian Hellman's "The Children's Hour" is quite that, because the characters in her play are ashamed of their homosexual feelings. (In fact, I mention this play in the article, as exemplary of a certain genre of American mid-Century tragedies that took up homosexuality thematically, but that don't qualify as "gay theater" according to my definition.) The characters do not identify as "gay" or "lesbian," rather, they are completely repulsed by the notion that they might be that. I'm less familiar with Basil Rathbone's play, but my understanding is that he never identified as gay (he was married to several women) despite his professional relationships with lesbian women in the theater (Eve La Gallienne, for example.) I would be interested in learning more about "The Captive," which sounds like a social problem play, in the vein of Ibsen, akin to Mae West's plays "The Drag" and "Sex," both of which take up homosexuality as themes, but also don't quite conform to the definition of "gay theater" that I laid out. My definition is inspired by W.E.B. Dubois' "by, for, and about" principle in relation to what constitutes true African-American literature: in order to be that, it must be all of those things. At any rate, I appreciate your feedback. Thank you.
Post a Comment